I personally don’t switch on its Applescript syntax colouring – I have it on the plain text setting – my main use is for:
pasting and labelling functions and snippets,
finding and copying them at a later date
pasting them into a code editor (where, of course, I do find syntax highlighting useful).
For syntax reference I use Dash, and hadn’t noticed that it had a user snippet archiving function.
I’ll personally stick with CodeBox for storage and retrieval of my own code, but perhaps mainly for lack of an incentive to move things.
If you are starting function/snippet storage afresh - it’s possible that Dash would work better, but I’m not well placed to comment - I haven’t really looked at that aspect of it.
I’ve been extensively testing CodeBox, Dash, and Quiver for several days now.
At this point, Dash seems better, but is still missing some stuff I really need, like a Snippet Title field that is NOT the Snippet expansion code.
I do really like the syntax ref, document lookup that Dash provides. The fact that it goes directly to the search term in the document is very helpful, unlike a google search that returns the document (like AppleScript Guidelines doc), but the actual thing I’m looking for is buried in the doc.
I like Dash, but I think the snippets manager section needs improvement.
I sent the Dash developer an email with some enhancement requests, and his reply was positive. Looks like he is working on a major upgrade for the snippets manager.
My my email and his response:
###From: Kapeli email@example.com
Date: Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 12:51 AM
###Subject: Re: Dash Enhancement Request (ER) for Title field
Is there any chance you could work this change in any time soon?
Nope, sorry. I plan on revamping the snippets features completely, so all of the features will come at once.
On 01 Aug 2015, at 02:21, JMichaelTX wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
Although all of the below ERs would be really helpful, I feel like #1, Title field, is essential.
I must be able to give the snippet a friendly, readable Title, while having, or not having, a snippet expansion code.
Is there any chance you could work this change in any time soon?
###Most of these features are planned, but I’m not sure when I’ll get to them.
Sorry for the inconvenience!
On 29 Jul 2015, at 23:45, JMichaelTX wrote:
Hi. I really like Dash, especially the API doc browser.
###However, I really need two more fields for the Snippet form:
Title — separate from the Snippet Appreciation
Rich text block where I can:
– Describe the snippet and document references
– Include rich-text hyperlinks (not just the URL)
###Also, two date fields would be very helpful:
– Date Created
– Date Updated
###Finally, I need a more selective Search engine, so that I could limit the search by these fields:
If you wish to try yet another tool, I can recommend aText at $4.99. It has an amazing range of options (especially in the insert department), and I use it daily (see image), though I don’t use the snippet in the image … it was only to show some of the options.
What’s wrong with a text expansion tool such as Typinator? (I forget if TextExpander can handle pictures, formatted text, and html, but Typinator can.) What are your criteria for a good clippings manager?
I actually used Quiver before but now use SnippetsLab as I find it much better than Quiver both aesthetically and functionally. I only keep code snippets in there with comments. It looks something like this.
The best thing is that it has a native alfred search and I can instantly find the note I need. I tried to like Quiver and used it for a bit but really do find SnippetsLab much better for that sort of thing.
I love the idea of cells in Quiver but I found there was a certain lag when switching between the cells and going to the cell that I needed quickly. For a code snippet manager, I need good organisation capability, easily adding snippets to the section I want, ability to add notes and comments, very quick retrieval of snippets. The quick retrieval of snippets is instantaneous with the Alfred workflow that developer provides with SnippetsLab. Plus the application looks a LOT better than Quiver. I am very keyboard centric person and I very much dislike having UI that I do not use be in the app and Quiver had a lot of that, I contacted the developer and he had no intention of changing it. SnippetsLab feels a lot faster has great language support, has a thing with fragments where you can split a snippet into different parts with corresponding notes. It just feels much better to use.
If you are interested, I have made a list of all the top applications / workflows / safari extensions that I use on my laptop. SnippetsLab is one of the top on there.
At first I was very satisfied with Quiver. But now that I have 400+ Notes/Snippets in Quiver, I am finding the search facility to be lacking. And, there is no built-in means to copy/paste a snippet into another app (although that would be easy to create in KM).
As I understand it (not having used it), the Alfred workflow for SnippetsLab should work easily with other tools (KM, AppleScript, etc), since it is simply based on a custom URL scheme.
But what has really impressed me about SnippetsLab, are its Smart Groups, and the same basic syntax that can be used i a general search/filter. This is not available in Quiver.
I’m giving serious thought to buying it, since it is only $10.
Well, I’m back to Quiver now, mainly because each Quiver Note can have multiple cells. I can first have a rich-text cell to document and provide links for the snippet, and then a code cell for the actual snippet.
The search in SnippetsLab is still superior, but the Quiver dev says he’s working in improving Quiver Search, including adding Spotlight Search.
Bottom Line: Try both, and see which one works best for you.
@JMichaelTX Thank you for so generously sharing your approaches and for innovating!
If I may ask a few questions, as today I started thinking about libraries and snippets to avoid trying to do again what I have done before . And I came here and searched, and of course found the right thread.
This makes so much sense. Using software like SnippetsLap is interesting, but it is yet another tool to manage. Curious as to how do you send snippets into suitable storage files - meaning macro, script, shortcuts...
Evernote vs DevonThink - Have you evaluated? I am guessing you did. I had purchased Devonthink - the last version, but soon felt that it would be better to manage files in Finder itself and use spotlight etc. Evernote on the other hand is interesting because it creates a container oriented structure for documents where you can attach images and PDFs etc in a note.
So do you have flat tags or hierarchical tags? And when convenient, would love to hear how you assign tags (has to be frictionless ), and if you leverage tags for filing etc as well.
Do you mean in file save dialogs?
Again, would be very interested in knowing how you organize these? Would be great if I can do it.
so do you use the script libraries in a standard and system wide location? And if so, how do you deal with version control as you may be tempted to change a function in a script library and that can break an earlier code?
I am sure you have shared this but I searched and did not find any.