Why Embedding Images Directly Into a Found Image's Action Is a Bad Idea

That is also correct.
At my work many of us have the same setup and here I share macros with colleagues.
So it is of course a good idea to think about it when designing macros for sharing.

1 Like

I’ll admit I’m a little jealous. Pretty much the only person in my close circle of friends/family/acquaintances that has a Mac and uses KM is my brother. But he lives 8 hours away so all our sharing is virtual :sweat_smile:


I advocate KM to all Mac users I meet. To the point where I maybe get a bit to pushy sometimes :smiley:


Me too. They wonder why I’m so efficient. I’ve only managed to convince 4 people to buy Keyboard Maestro. Only 1 really uses it on a semi-respectable level.

1 Like

I’m in the same boat Chris. That’s why I love the forum. I can relate. Meanwhile, I claim several of you as my Mac friends. :grinning:


@kcwhat take a closer look at the SF-Symbols. The display is much better than the one integrated in KM.

A big advantage is also the search function.


FYI, I just posted this:

Hi @kcwhat. Thanks for pointing out my oversight. :grinning:

Hey Alex,
I agree that all of the SF symbols aren’t in KM nor are the color variations or the search feature. I’m assuming that 152 MBs of data wasn’t attractive enough, for Peter, to bloat KM’s size. But he did include a subset of the SF symbols. I know this was discussed, before, in another post. However, I’ll stick with what’s native. :grinning:

1 Like

No worries @_jims. That’s the thing about Keyboard Maestro… things are hiding in plain sight. It’s the gift that keeps giving. :grinning:

1 Like

It sure does. :+1:

My (poor) excuse for missing them is that I normally don't use the third set of icons (Character) because I prefer the appearance of the first two sets (Internal and Application). Looks like they were added to KM v10.0 or 10.0.1. Funny thing is I've been using SF Symbols with iOS for many months.

@appleianer yes it is! And it includes Search.

1 Like

If I'm using a synchronized macro file, would I be able to use image files instead of pasting them into my macros for Found Image actions? Most of the time, the computers using the sync'd macro file are NOT connected to the computer hosting the file. It does seem that for a sync'd file you may be better off pasting the images in.

That's a good question, and the short answer is you need the image file on each device that the macro is used.

I have all of the images I use in a folder in my Dropbox account that way they sync between all my devices and the path is the same regardless of the device. I have 147 images in the folder (organized by category, (like Music, Work etc) and they only take up 2.7 MB.

Ah - I guess I will have to keep them in the macro file. I often use the other computers offline, and I'll periodically connect them to the server to refresh the macro file. So far my sync file is not too bad - still less than 1Mb.

The nice thing is once the images are synced on your computer they're there forever unless you delete them. So you could still use that method as long as you connect your other computers to the Internet after building a new macro so any image files are synced.

I've read this thread with interest and have some questions/observations:

  • Linking to a file does not give me the visual feedback I like for troubleshooting. Do you find this a limitation?
  • I could use a path variable so the folder could be easily shared with other users accessing the same OneDrive folder.
  • It seems this approach would add a lot of file-management demands to an otherwise simple screen capture process. Since I'm not seeing the delays described by other I think I'll stick with what's working.

I'm not sure why you would not have the same visual feedback... I still do when I use file paths. You do have to have evaluate results turned on is all. See the screenshots below ↓

Images (click to expand/collapse)

you could indeed... I use a variable in all my file paths that way I can switch back and forth between cloud services (since all my files are stored in Dropbox and iCloud).

It does add a little more work to set things up since you have to specify a file path and then make sure you never move/rename that file. But if you continue building macros and make use of the found image actions it's really only a matter of time before you plist file becomes bloated.

On another note... if you want to use file paths but are concerned about accidentally moving/renaming a file you might have embedded in a macro, I recently built a macro to search your KM plist file for any file(s) you select in Finder, and tag them if they're used in a macro. This allows you to quickly scan a file, or even an entire directory and see exactly which files are used and which ones are not. It has been very helpful for me the last couple of days to search all my directories and locate files that I no longer use in any macros so I can get rid of them (I scanned over 6,000 files in about 10 minutes).

KMF: Find Which Files Are Used in Your Macros and Tag Them Accordingly

By "feedback" I mean the advantage of seeing the captured image in the action and being able to open it to full-size with Space Bar.

How do you streamline saving a screen capture to the intended folder? Do you alter your "Screen Capture" folder or manually move the image after capturing? This also seems tedious compared to capturing to clipboard and pasting into the reservoir.

I share macros with 5 other users. On occasion one of them may need to change fussiness or re-capture a screen image. Since they do not have write privileges to the shared folder they'd still need to use the reservoir or create their own "image folder". Not sure I like that.

Ah ok! I didn't realize that's what you were referring to.

I move the image manually, but all my images I use go into the same folder in my Dropbox which I open right to with another macro so it's a quick process.

I have no solution for that since I'm the only one who uses my macros :laughing: